Baraka
is
a film of amazing footage and worldwide wonder, and even being a non-narrative,
it conveys more meaning than most movies out there. Baraka was powerful and moving, and even though it was slow moving
overall, that is the only way someone can get anything out of it, and let it also
be a memorable and meaningful experience. This film relates to semester 1, not
through satire, but through a 'hero's journey' and definitely through uses of allegory.
In general, Baraka relates to this
class, because the film in itself represents world literature and the art of
everything world literature and the world has to offer. Through how the film is
put together in every way and what videos are caught to create this film, it
all has allegorical meaning, because it literally shows what's happening and
why, and it metaphorically shows us what Mary Ann Brussat was trying to explain
through pure video. World literature is the art created and written to express
human nature and the ills in society, and is made to try and unite the world as
one mind, and allow everyone to see something another would. Basically, Baraka is trying to convey that idea
through video, emotion, and allegory, and is trying to convince the world of
seeing things differently, and doing things differently. All the kinds of
writing we read 1st semester are a part of world literature, as are all
documented arts with meaning, and all of them in the end, are trying to show an
ill through the writing of life and death. The only difference is that it shows
all of this, but through video footage instead of words. Baraka does relate to almost everything we learned 1st semester,
and is directly related to the study of world literature.
This
film is one that creates emotion, fear, compassion, and curiosity through all
of its elements. All of the footage is great, some with more meaning, and some
with more emotion. There are certain scenes that express the compassion and
wonderment that Brussat tries to show in perfection. The natural scenes from
beginning to end, starting with a partial solar eclipse, to the summits of the
Himalayan mountains, the many wild animals of different regions, the waterfalls
in Argentina, and ending with the beauty of the stars in the night sky, and
lastly a full solar eclipse, are amazingly shot and well put together. These
scenes show the true beauty of nature, and rise compassion through its
emotional beauty, and wonderment through all its possible meanings in context
of how the film is put together. There are scientific and literal reasons why
all nature is important and how it works, but to figure out what it can mean
metaphorically to something else of us and the world, is an answer much harder
to prove. There are so many categories of scenes in the film, including natural,
spiritual, and technological based scenes, that have so much allegorical
meaning to the world and life as we know it. The images that impacted me the
most were the scenes showing the ills of society directly, and how those ills
and the consequences of technology have affected nature and the world at large.
For example, the egg factory was really scarring to me because it showed me how
gross the process is of eating chicken product, and how it ruins the natural
reproduction rate of chickens immensely in the world, all because of what we,
one species, wants for what we call society. Another scarring scene to me was
the burning of the oil wells in Kuwait during the Gulf War. Not only is it
destroying the environment by pollution, which makes me sadder than anything,
but it is also wasting precious energy resource for technology of the world,
all because of an ill in societies. The ills in society, whatever they may be,
are impacting the natural level of the world, but also the societal level of
the world. We are destroying the earth and
ourselves, and it only gets worse every day of every year. These two scenes
specifically impacted me as did a good few others, and all these scenes seem to
be ones that Brussat viewed as impactful images as well. How the film is put
together on a cinematographically based level, is very important to the meaning
and emotion of this film, especially since it's a non-narrative, it's all about
how it's put together. The music and video are directly connected, in the sense
that whenever the footage speeds up, so does the kind of music, and whenever
the footage is more intense, the music becomes more intense, and vice versa for
both techniques. Without the music, the film would be uninteresting, and thus
the video would be less emotional and meaningful to the viewers. Of course the
great part of this film is that it is all based on the video itself, so the
video is the art and the meaning. Both together, express the messages of the
film, and make it much more impactful as a pair.
I
believe the main message Brussat is trying to convey in Baraka is the evolution of mankind and how we have created society,
religion, and have lived along side with nature, but that with our evolution,
we are slowly destroying the natural world and soon ourselves and our own
existence in the vast universe that we live in and have yet to discover.
Brussat and Ron Fricke, the director, showed just how beautiful life and the
world we live in are. Yet because of us, there is also war, destruction, and unnatural
death. They both created a display of the diversity of everything in our world,
from how beautiful the world can seem, and how sickening it really is, to how
beautiful the world really is, and how sickening it can be. We can make a
change in the way we live for many things in nature, and we can keep doing things
that benefit us, but we can't do one or the other. We have to find a way to
sustain the life of everything,
including us and the world. These are the messages and meanings I believe
Brussat's thesis would have been trying to express, and I think she was trying
to teach the world of these aspects of life as we know it.
No comments:
Post a Comment